<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modify TrueCrypt Encryption Boot Loader Strings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings</link>
	<description>Rendering computer investigations irrelevant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sub</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>sub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-290</guid>
		<description>If an expert hacker access my drive whether in person or over the net, could he modify the boot loader (or extend the size if need be) to insert a keylogger (still keeping the TC boot screen intact) that would load a NIC driver then transmit the password over the net, therefore, compromising the use of TC encryption?  or would the checksum defeat the extension and modification of the boot loader?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If an expert hacker access my drive whether in person or over the net, could he modify the boot loader (or extend the size if need be) to insert a keylogger (still keeping the TC boot screen intact) that would load a NIC driver then transmit the password over the net, therefore, compromising the use of TC encryption?  or would the checksum defeat the extension and modification of the boot loader?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAR</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>LAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Truecrypt is great and stable.

Truecrypt drived by the features and marketing strategies.
Then People and IT Pros like it.
They just don’t care if it is 100% safe.

But any security product which is not 100% open sourced is very dangerous for keeping very sensitive data on your expensive laptop or your super tiny usb flash disk.

We can’t prove that it is really safe if we do not have the complete source code and a certification.

Imagine have sex with someone you don’t really know.
Then 1 week later you are positive.

Forum is not also open to anyone.

I believe any security free/open source products should be certified (not recognized) as 100% safe (certified (not by anyone but by a legit institution like NIST)

If i am working on the goverment.
Should I tell anyone that the conspired product gave us backdoor on it.
If i am one of the developer.
Should i tell anyone that i created a personal backdoor on it.

LAR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truecrypt is great and stable.</p>
<p>Truecrypt drived by the features and marketing strategies.<br />
Then People and IT Pros like it.<br />
They just don’t care if it is 100% safe.</p>
<p>But any security product which is not 100% open sourced is very dangerous for keeping very sensitive data on your expensive laptop or your super tiny usb flash disk.</p>
<p>We can’t prove that it is really safe if we do not have the complete source code and a certification.</p>
<p>Imagine have sex with someone you don’t really know.<br />
Then 1 week later you are positive.</p>
<p>Forum is not also open to anyone.</p>
<p>I believe any security free/open source products should be certified (not recognized) as 100% safe (certified (not by anyone but by a legit institution like NIST)</p>
<p>If i am working on the goverment.<br />
Should I tell anyone that the conspired product gave us backdoor on it.<br />
If i am one of the developer.<br />
Should i tell anyone that i created a personal backdoor on it.</p>
<p>LAR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammie</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 01:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Hi!

1. Create Truecrypt rescue disc.
2. Use Winhex application to erase sector 1 to 63.
3. Then, you are required to use Truecrypt Rescue Disc each PC start.

Question:
1. Erasing sector 1 to 63 once is enough?
2. Anything to erase/remove/modify aside from Truecrypt boot loader, disregarding network/server tracks?
3. Is there anyone can verified that this is 100% false-positive, even from new/updated forensic application?
4. How about Truecrypt volume tracks?

Thanks for reply.
-am</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>1. Create Truecrypt rescue disc.<br />
2. Use Winhex application to erase sector 1 to 63.<br />
3. Then, you are required to use Truecrypt Rescue Disc each PC start.</p>
<p>Question:<br />
1. Erasing sector 1 to 63 once is enough?<br />
2. Anything to erase/remove/modify aside from Truecrypt boot loader, disregarding network/server tracks?<br />
3. Is there anyone can verified that this is 100% false-positive, even from new/updated forensic application?<br />
4. How about Truecrypt volume tracks?</p>
<p>Thanks for reply.<br />
-am</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myforwik</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>myforwik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Its not exactally to 0x3700,

If you go to address 0x1B0 there is a two byte integer that is the size of the file.
So if you read those two bytes (in version 6.3a it is usually 0x97 0x2D = 0x2D97 = 11671 bytes. And the bytes start at 0xA00.

The file format is actually gzip, which is openable by most zip programs including windows zip folders etc.

Unfortuently if you edit the strings and re-zip, and save it back to 0xA00 it won&#039;t work, because there is a checksum at 434d. Thats why I wrote a program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not exactally to 0&#215;3700,</p>
<p>If you go to address 0x1B0 there is a two byte integer that is the size of the file.<br />
So if you read those two bytes (in version 6.3a it is usually 0&#215;97 0x2D = 0x2D97 = 11671 bytes. And the bytes start at 0xA00.</p>
<p>The file format is actually gzip, which is openable by most zip programs including windows zip folders etc.</p>
<p>Unfortuently if you edit the strings and re-zip, and save it back to 0xA00 it won&#8217;t work, because there is a checksum at 434d. Thats why I wrote a program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max (Admin)</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Max (Admin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-203</guid>
		<description>I guess what probably needs to happen to do anything serious is to just start going through the TrueCrypt source code as Hans had suggested.

I&#039;m currently in the process of &quot;modernizing&quot; the site with a new theme and I&#039;ve a ton of other projects ongoing so I&#039;ve no time to come up with a way to get rid of these strings.

I mean the simple option would probably be to modify the source and rebuild (truecrypt binary) but it would be cool to have some process of editing this data, compressing it all again and then adding it back to the boot loader.

Also, Lars, here is the process I went through. There are probably better methods but this is what worked for me:

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;1. Using HXD hex editor copy out the data between the offsets myforwik mentions and save to a file.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;2. Extract the data using 7-zip, you&#039;ll have to force it&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;3. Open the extracted data and the last 460 bytes should be these extra strings&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ul&gt;



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what probably needs to happen to do anything serious is to just start going through the TrueCrypt source code as Hans had suggested.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently in the process of &#8220;modernizing&#8221; the site with a new theme and I&#8217;ve a ton of other projects ongoing so I&#8217;ve no time to come up with a way to get rid of these strings.</p>
<p>I mean the simple option would probably be to modify the source and rebuild (truecrypt binary) but it would be cool to have some process of editing this data, compressing it all again and then adding it back to the boot loader.</p>
<p>Also, Lars, here is the process I went through. There are probably better methods but this is what worked for me:</p>
<ul>
<li>1. Using HXD hex editor copy out the data between the offsets myforwik mentions and save to a file.</li>
<li>2. Extract the data using 7-zip, you&#8217;ll have to force it</li>
<li>3. Open the extracted data and the last 460 bytes should be these extra strings</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max (Admin)</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Max (Admin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Here it is uncompressed, I setup a test environment with the latest TrueCrypt version and a Windows XP system in VMWare. It is the last 460 bytes after uncompressing the offsets that Myforwik provided. Bravo Myforwik, I had stopped all research on Truecrypt so this is some exciting information for me, even if it might be public or widely known now. I don&#039;t know if it is but props to Myforwik for the info.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Error: .Write.Read.. error:. Drive:. Sector:.. CHS:. MB ..Drive .. not found: ....No bootable partition found. TrueCrypt Boot Loader 6.3a...    Keyboard Controls:....    [Esc]  .Boot Non-Hidden System (Boot Manager).Skip Authentication (Boot Manager)..? (y/n): .y...n...[.]    .[Esc]  Cancel.....Enter password.. for hidden system:...: ..Booting.......BIOS reserved too much memory: .- Upgrade BIOS..- Use a different motherboard model/brand...Warning: Caps Lock is on....Incorrect password......If you are sure the password is correct, the key data may be damaged. Boot your..TrueCrypt Rescue Disk and select &#039;Repair Options&#039; &gt; &#039;Restore key data&#039;.......Bootable Partitions:....Drive: ., Partition: ., Size: ..Press 1-9 to select partition: .Your BIOS does not support large drives. due to a bug...- Enable LBA in BIOS....Copying system to hidden volume. To abort, press Esc.......If aborted, copying will have to start from the beginning (if attempted again).....Abort.To fix bad sectors: 1) Terminate 2) Encrypt and decrypt sys partition 3) Retry.....Remaining: ...Copying completed..MMAP: ..Memory corrupted.. è..PAMS&lt;/blockquote&gt;

C&#039;mon TrueCrypt, this isn&#039;t cool :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is uncompressed, I setup a test environment with the latest TrueCrypt version and a Windows XP system in VMWare. It is the last 460 bytes after uncompressing the offsets that Myforwik provided. Bravo Myforwik, I had stopped all research on Truecrypt so this is some exciting information for me, even if it might be public or widely known now. I don&#8217;t know if it is but props to Myforwik for the info.</p>
<blockquote><p>Error: .Write.Read.. error:. Drive:. Sector:.. CHS:. MB ..Drive .. not found: &#8230;.No bootable partition found. TrueCrypt Boot Loader 6.3a&#8230;    Keyboard Controls:&#8230;.    [Esc]  .Boot Non-Hidden System (Boot Manager).Skip Authentication (Boot Manager)..? (y/n): .y&#8230;n&#8230;[.]    .[Esc]  Cancel&#8230;..Enter password.. for hidden system:&#8230;: ..Booting&#8230;&#8230;.BIOS reserved too much memory: .- Upgrade BIOS..- Use a different motherboard model/brand&#8230;Warning: Caps Lock is on&#8230;.Incorrect password&#8230;&#8230;If you are sure the password is correct, the key data may be damaged. Boot your..TrueCrypt Rescue Disk and select &#8216;Repair Options&#8217; > &#8216;Restore key data&#8217;&#8230;&#8230;.Bootable Partitions:&#8230;.Drive: ., Partition: ., Size: ..Press 1-9 to select partition: .Your BIOS does not support large drives. due to a bug&#8230;- Enable LBA in BIOS&#8230;.Copying system to hidden volume. To abort, press Esc&#8230;&#8230;.If aborted, copying will have to start from the beginning (if attempted again)&#8230;..Abort.To fix bad sectors: 1) Terminate 2) Encrypt and decrypt sys partition 3) Retry&#8230;..Remaining: &#8230;Copying completed..MMAP: ..Memory corrupted.. è..PAMS</p></blockquote>
<p>C&#8217;mon TrueCrypt, this isn&#8217;t cool <img src='http://www.anti-forensics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Myfor how is it you are extracting or uncompressing the data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Myfor how is it you are extracting or uncompressing the data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max (Admin)</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Max (Admin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Great information Myforwik!

I currently cannot confirm or deny your claims but if you could point the readers to some documentation on that it would be great.

It would make a great addition to the article or a secondary article, with props to you of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information Myforwik!</p>
<p>I currently cannot confirm or deny your claims but if you could point the readers to some documentation on that it would be great.</p>
<p>It would make a great addition to the article or a secondary article, with props to you of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myforwik</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Myforwik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-199</guid>
		<description>I have done extensive research on the Truecrypt boot loader.

From your screenshot of the HEXs editor I can tell that you were running truecrypt 6.1a. Changing that 1 line of text fools no one.

You have to realise that the truecrypt boot loader takes up sectors 1 to 63 of the harddisk - and it is not encrypted.

The only way you can really hide truecrypt is to delete your first 63 sectors and use the rescue disk to boot your PC every time you boot up.

The strings for the main loggin screen aren&#039;t encrypted. They are simple compressed. If you copy from 0xA00 to about 0x3700 into a file, you can open it, as its a zip file, then all the truecrypt strings that you see on the login screen are available for everyone to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done extensive research on the Truecrypt boot loader.</p>
<p>From your screenshot of the HEXs editor I can tell that you were running truecrypt 6.1a. Changing that 1 line of text fools no one.</p>
<p>You have to realise that the truecrypt boot loader takes up sectors 1 to 63 of the harddisk &#8211; and it is not encrypted.</p>
<p>The only way you can really hide truecrypt is to delete your first 63 sectors and use the rescue disk to boot your PC every time you boot up.</p>
<p>The strings for the main loggin screen aren&#8217;t encrypted. They are simple compressed. If you copy from 0xA00 to about 0&#215;3700 into a file, you can open it, as its a zip file, then all the truecrypt strings that you see on the login screen are available for everyone to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBAN - Emergency data destruction - Page 2 - Why We Protest - IRAN</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/modify-truecrypt-encryption-boot-loader-strings/comment-page-1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>DBAN - Emergency data destruction - Page 2 - Why We Protest - IRAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=159#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] TrueCrypt and modify the boot loader with a hex editor to remove the string &quot;truecrypt&quot;  Modify TrueCrypt Encryption Boot Loader Strings &#124; Anti-Forensics  This way you&#039;ve a disk full of data, it&#039;s just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TrueCrypt and modify the boot loader with a hex editor to remove the string &quot;truecrypt&quot;  Modify TrueCrypt Encryption Boot Loader Strings | Anti-Forensics  This way you&#8217;ve a disk full of data, it&#8217;s just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
