<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Anti-Forensics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anti-forensics.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com</link>
	<description>Rendering computer investigations irrelevant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get Sloppy and Get Caught by Max</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/get-sloppy-and-get-caught/comment-page-1#comment-4846</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=1368#comment-4846</guid>
		<description>Hey guy, relax. This is just the news section! You won&#039;t learn anything here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guy, relax. This is just the news section! You won&#8217;t learn anything here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get Sloppy and Get Caught by anon</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/get-sloppy-and-get-caught/comment-page-1#comment-4808</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=1368#comment-4808</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but no one gives a fuck what you think about the clown. Get to the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but no one gives a fuck what you think about the clown. Get to the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disk Wiping &#8211; One Pass is Enough by The Witch Doctor</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/disk-wiping-one-pass-is-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4722</link>
		<dc:creator>The Witch Doctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=336#comment-4722</guid>
		<description>One pass is enough.  Even with an MFM there is less than a 50% chance of getting it right so you&#039;d be better off just using a coin and calling heads for one and tails for zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One pass is enough.  Even with an MFM there is less than a 50% chance of getting it right so you&#8217;d be better off just using a coin and calling heads for one and tails for zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disk Wiping &#8211; One Pass is Enough &#8211; Part 2 (this time with screenshots) by wascalwabbit</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/disk-wiping-one-pass-is-enough-part-2-this-time-with-screenshots/comment-page-1#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>wascalwabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=358#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>This used to be a problem and is the reason for the old wives (geeks) tale of wiping a bazillion times, just to be sure. HDDs have come a long way and where they use to have tracks about 3 inches wide (not really, but you get the point), the tracks are so small that this is a non-issue with &quot;modern&quot; drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This used to be a problem and is the reason for the old wives (geeks) tale of wiping a bazillion times, just to be sure. HDDs have come a long way and where they use to have tracks about 3 inches wide (not really, but you get the point), the tracks are so small that this is a non-issue with &#8220;modern&#8221; drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get Sloppy and Get Caught by RonaldMcDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/get-sloppy-and-get-caught/comment-page-1#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>RonaldMcDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=1368#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>Hmm, now I&#039;m getting paranoid about my ISP seeing me checking this article. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, now I&#8217;m getting paranoid about my ISP seeing me checking this article. <img src='http://www.anti-forensics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disk Wiping with dcfldd by cldxx</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/disk-wiping-with-dcfldd/comment-page-1#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>cldxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=1003#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>Does dcfldd work on ssd drives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does dcfldd work on ssd drives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disk Wiping with dcfldd by cldxx</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/disk-wiping-with-dcfldd/comment-page-1#comment-4447</link>
		<dc:creator>cldxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=1003#comment-4447</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t you just have a two hard drive setup? One with backtrack/ubuntu and a second to dcfldd when done?

Just copy a copy a vmware player image to the second drive.

There could be a problem though..

Are there any special settings you need for vmware player to make sure swap, mem file and log writes happen just on the second drive?

I&#039;m not familiar enough with vmware player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t you just have a two hard drive setup? One with backtrack/ubuntu and a second to dcfldd when done?</p>
<p>Just copy a copy a vmware player image to the second drive.</p>
<p>There could be a problem though..</p>
<p>Are there any special settings you need for vmware player to make sure swap, mem file and log writes happen just on the second drive?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar enough with vmware player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disk Wiping with dcfldd by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/disk-wiping-with-dcfldd/comment-page-1#comment-4180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=1003#comment-4180</guid>
		<description>Actually with some of the newer drives that have hardware-level full-disk encryption (particularly SSD&#039;s)--as in nothing gets written plaintext--you can wipe the drive in less than a second by overwriting the encryption keys, which has the same effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually with some of the newer drives that have hardware-level full-disk encryption (particularly SSD&#8217;s)&#8211;as in nothing gets written plaintext&#8211;you can wipe the drive in less than a second by overwriting the encryption keys, which has the same effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disk Wiping &#8211; One Pass is Enough by BamaRebel</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/disk-wiping-one-pass-is-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4106</link>
		<dc:creator>BamaRebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=336#comment-4106</guid>
		<description>In actuality, one pass at the bit level is enough to not allow recovery of any type. Here is something for you to read:

http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/security-basics/2008-10/msg00199.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In actuality, one pass at the bit level is enough to not allow recovery of any type. Here is something for you to read:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/security-basics/2008-10/msg00199.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/security-basics/2008-10/msg00199.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hunting Anonymous Pt. 2 by dc</title>
		<link>http://www.anti-forensics.com/hunting-anonymous-pt-2/comment-page-1#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator>dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anti-forensics.com/?p=1321#comment-4056</guid>
		<description>Nice article and very informative website. I love it but you should inform people about disk cryptor which is a FREE disk encryption application for windows and is miles ahead of Truecrypt. The only downside of dc is that it doesn&#039;t support file containers at this time. http://www.diskcryptor.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article and very informative website. I love it but you should inform people about disk cryptor which is a FREE disk encryption application for windows and is miles ahead of Truecrypt. The only downside of dc is that it doesn&#8217;t support file containers at this time. <a href="http://www.diskcryptor.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.diskcryptor.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

